2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
FiatMakeMitsubishi
BravoModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1747 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
113 HPPower116 HP
154 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4025 mmLength4435 mm
1755 mmWidth1710 mm
1420 mmHeight1405 mm
1100 KgWeight1130 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…