2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Fiat Bravo vs 2000 Citroen Saxo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.6 VTS (118 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
FiatMakeCitroen
BravoModelSaxo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
10,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
193 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1747 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
113 HPPower118 HP
154 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationCitroen Saxo
4025 mmLength3718 mm
1755 mmWidth1595 mm
1420 mmHeight1368 mm
1100 KgWeight935 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Fiat Bravo and 2000 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…