DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 FAW Besturn B50 vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeMazda
Besturn B50Model3
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
139 HPPower116 HP
172 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4460 mm
1785 mmWidth1755 mm
1435 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1259 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 FAW Besturn B50 and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…