2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 i (116 Hp) 2013Overall Score54.25/100
2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 FAW Besturn B50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • FAW
Besturn B50
FAW Besturn B50 1.8 (139 Hp) 2013Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B50
MazdaMakeFAW
3ModelBesturn B50
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B50
12,2 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
116 HPPower139 HP
145 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFAW Besturn B50
4460 mmLength4615 mm
1755 mmWidth1785 mm
1470 mmHeight1435 mm
1259 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 FAW Besturn B50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…