DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Suzuki SX4 vs 2013 FAW Besturn B50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki SX4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFAW
SX4ModelBesturn B50
2013Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower139 HP
120 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4300 mmLength4615 mm
1765 mmWidth1785 mm
1575 mmHeight1435 mm
1240 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Suzuki SX4 and 2013 FAW Besturn B50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki SX4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…