DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 FAW A6 vs 2000 Nissan Laurel Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Laurel

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW A6SpecificationNissan Laurel
FAWMakeNissan
A6ModelLaurel
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

FAW A6SpecificationNissan Laurel
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
216 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower155 HP
210 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

FAW A6SpecificationNissan Laurel
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW A6SpecificationNissan Laurel
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW A6SpecificationNissan Laurel
4886 mmLength4765 mm
1810 mmWidth1730 mm
1475 mmHeight1400 mm
1465 KgWeight1390 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 FAW A6 and 2000 Nissan Laurel approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…