DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Honda Orthia vs 2000 FAW A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Orthia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda OrthiaSpecificationFAW A6
HondaMakeFAW
OrthiaModelA6
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Honda OrthiaSpecificationFAW A6
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
190 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
192 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda OrthiaSpecificationFAW A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank70 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Honda OrthiaSpecificationFAW A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda OrthiaSpecificationFAW A6
4570 mmLength4886 mm
1700 mmWidth1810 mm
1490 mmHeight1475 mm
1170 KgWeight1465 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Honda Orthia and 2000 FAW A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Orthia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…