DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi A3 vs 2000 FAW A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationFAW A6
AudiMakeFAW
A3ModelA6
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationFAW A6
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
202 km/hTop speed216 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
173 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationFAW A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationFAW A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationFAW A6
4152 mmLength4886 mm
1735 mmWidth1810 mm
1427 mmHeight1475 mm
1160 KgWeight1465 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi A3 and 2000 FAW A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…