DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 FAW A6 vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW A6SpecificationAudi A3
FAWMakeAudi
A6ModelA3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

FAW A6SpecificationAudi A3
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
216 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
150 HPPower125 HP
210 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW A6SpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW A6SpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW A6SpecificationAudi A3
4886 mmLength4152 mm
1810 mmWidth1735 mm
1475 mmHeight1427 mm
1465 KgWeight1160 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 FAW A6 and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…