DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Daewoo Musso vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeMazda
MussoModel323
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
168 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower90 HP
179 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4200 mm
1864 mmWidth1705 mm
1735 mmHeight1410 mm
1890 KgWeight1175 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Daewoo Musso and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…