DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Musso
MGMakeDaewoo
ZSModelMusso
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Musso
9,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
19 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower129 HP
160 NmTorque179 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Musso
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Musso
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationDaewoo Musso
4520 mmLength4640 mm
1700 mmWidth1864 mm
1390 mmHeight1735 mm
1125 KgWeight1890 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…