DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaewoo
323ModelMusso
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
178 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower129 HP
220 NmTorque179 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4640 mm
1705 mmWidth1864 mm
1410 mmHeight1735 mm
1175 KgWeight1890 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…