2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 2.0 16V (132 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 2.0 TDi (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZR
CitroenMakeMG
XsaraModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZR
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
132 HPPower113 HP
180 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZR
4167 mmLength4011 mm
1698 mmWidth1690 mm
1405 mmHeight1400 mm
1180 KgWeight1155 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…