2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 2.0 16V (132 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen Xsara
RoverMakeCitroen
25ModelXsara
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen Xsara
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
185 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower132 HP
260 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen Xsara
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank54 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen Xsara
3990 mmLength4167 mm
1688 mmWidth1698 mm
1419 mmHeight1405 mm
1130 KgWeight1180 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…