DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelXsara
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
193 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower132 HP
260 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
4520 mmLength4167 mm
1700 mmWidth1698 mm
1390 mmHeight1405 mm
1225 KgWeight1180 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…