DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Xsara vs 2004 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.25–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeDaewoo
XsaraModelRezzo
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
177 km/hTop speed111 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower121 HP
153 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4350 mm
1698 mmWidth1750 mm
1405 mmHeight1580 mm
1070 KgWeight1392 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Xsara and 2004 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…