2004 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
2004 Mazda 2 vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2004Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
MazdaMakeCitroen
2ModelXsara
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
11,4 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
181 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
101 HPPower101 HP
146 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen Xsara
3925 mmLength4167 mm
1680 mmWidth1698 mm
1545 mmHeight1405 mm
1080 KgWeight1070 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 2 and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…