DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Shuma vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeCitroen
ShumaModelXsara
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
186 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1594 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
101 HPPower101 HP
144 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank54 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4525 mmLength4167 mm
1720 mmWidth1698 mm
1415 mmHeight1405 mm
1115 KgWeight1070 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Shuma and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…