DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Nissan Elgrand Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeNissan
XMModelElgrand
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2963 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
200 HPPower170 HP
260 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4740 mm
1794 mmWidth1775 mm
1389 mmHeight1940 mm
1500 KgWeight2060 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Nissan Elgrand approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…