DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Elgrand vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCitroen
ElgrandModelXM
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
170 HPPower200 HP
353 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4708 mm
1775 mmWidth1794 mm
1940 mmHeight1389 mm
2060 KgWeight1500 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Elgrand and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…