DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Citroen XM vs 1995 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda MPV
CitroenMakeMazda
XMModelMPV
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda MPV
8,6 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2963 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
200 HPPower154 HP
260 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda MPV
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda MPV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda MPV
4708 mmLength4465 mm
1794 mmWidth1826 mm
1389 mmHeight1694 mm
1500 KgWeight1831 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Citroen XM and 1995 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…