DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mazda MPV vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MPVSpecificationCitroen XM
MazdaMakeCitroen
MPVModelXM
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda MPVSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h8,6 s
170 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
154 HPPower200 HP
230 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MPVSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MPVSpecificationCitroen XM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MPVSpecificationCitroen XM
4465 mmLength4708 mm
1826 mmWidth1794 mm
1694 mmHeight1389 mm
1831 KgWeight1500 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mazda MPV and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…