DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mercury Sable vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeCitroen
SableModelXM
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
190 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
157 HPPower200 HP
251 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4708 mm
1850 mmWidth1794 mm
1410 mmHeight1389 mm
1515 KgWeight1500 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mercury Sable and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…