DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Discovery vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCitroen
DiscoveryModelXM
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
157 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
136 HPPower129 HP
300 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
95 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4708 mm
1860 mmWidth1794 mm
1890 mmHeight1394 mm
2020 KgWeight1564 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Discovery and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…