DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationCitroen XM
GAZMakeCitroen
31ModelXM
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationCitroen XM
13,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
173 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
150 HPPower129 HP
206 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationCitroen XM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationCitroen XM
4870 mmLength4708 mm
1800 mmWidth1794 mm
1422 mmHeight1394 mm
1400 KgWeight1564 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…