DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationGAZ 31
CitroenMakeGAZ
XMModel31
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationGAZ 31
12,1 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
201 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
129 HPPower150 HP
285 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationGAZ 31
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationGAZ 31
4708 mmLength4870 mm
1794 mmWidth1800 mm
1394 mmHeight1422 mm
1564 KgWeight1400 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…