DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Citroen XM vs 1998 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XMModelMX-6
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
192 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2088 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
109 HPPower115 HP
250 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4615 mm
1794 mmWidth1750 mm
1394 mmHeight1310 mm
1442 KgWeight1120 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Citroen XM and 1998 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…