DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda MX-6 vs 1998 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
MX-6ModelXM
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
204 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2088 cc
115 HPPower109 HP
170 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4708 mm
1750 mmWidth1794 mm
1310 mmHeight1394 mm
1120 KgWeight1442 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda MX-6 and 1998 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…