DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Discovery vs 1998 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCitroen
DiscoveryModelXM
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
157 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2088 cc
111 HPPower109 HP
265 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
89 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4524 mmLength4708 mm
1810 mmWidth1794 mm
1960 mmHeight1394 mm
2020 KgWeight1442 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Discovery and 1998 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…