DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Citroen XM vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
CitroenMakeAudi
XMModel80
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
9,3 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
215 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
147 HPPower140 HP
235 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank66 lt
14,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
4708 mmLength4482 mm
1794 mmWidth1695 mm
1394 mmHeight1408 mm
1401 KgWeight1310 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Citroen XM and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…