1995 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0i 4X4 (136 Hp) 1995Overall Score62.25/100
1995 Ford Mondeo vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 Turbo (147 Hp) 1995Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationCitroen XM
FordMakeCitroen
MondeoModelXM
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
198 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower147 HP
180 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationCitroen XM
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationCitroen XM
4631 mmLength4708 mm
1749 mmWidth1794 mm
1442 mmHeight1394 mm
1405 KgWeight1401 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Mondeo and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…