1995 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 E 16V (140 Hp) 1995Overall Score61.25/100
1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 Turbo (147 Hp) 1995Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
AudiMakeCitroen
80ModelXM
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
197 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower147 HP
185 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
4482 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1408 mmHeight1394 mm
1310 KgWeight1401 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…