DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Citroen XM vs 1992 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeOpel
XMModelOmega
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower100 HP
226 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4770 mm
1795 mmWidth1760 mm
1385 mmHeight1480 mm
1400 KgWeight1265 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Citroen XM and 1992 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…