1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 E 16V (140 Hp) 1992Overall Score60.5/100
1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 i TCT (145 Hp) 1992Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
AudiMakeCitroen
80ModelXM
1992Model year1992
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed212 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower145 HP
0 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
—Length4710 mm
—Width1795 mm
—Height1385 mm
—Weight1400 Kg
—Wheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…