1992 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.0 E 16V (137 Hp) 1992Overall Score60.5/100
1992 Audi 100 vs 1992 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 i TCT (145 Hp) 1992Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationCitroen XM
AudiMakeCitroen
100ModelXM
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationCitroen XM
10,1 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
204 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
137 HPPower145 HP
181 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationCitroen XM
4790 mmLength4710 mm
1777 mmWidth1795 mm
1431 mmHeight1385 mm
1370 KgWeight1400 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 100 and 1992 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…