DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Citroen XM vs 1992 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XMModelCronos
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
145 HPPower125 HP
226 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4695 mm
1795 mmWidth1770 mm
1385 mmHeight1400 mm
1400 KgWeight1260 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Citroen XM and 1992 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…