DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Citroen XM vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
CitroenMakeAudi
XMModel80
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
145 HPPower140 HP
226 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank40 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
205/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi 80
4710 mmLength—
1795 mmWidth—
1385 mmHeight—
1400 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Citroen XM and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…