DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen Jumpy vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Jumpy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolvo
JumpyModelS40
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4805 mmLength4476 mm
1895 mmWidth1770 mm
1942 mmHeight1454 mm
1920 KgWeight1498 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen Jumpy and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Jumpy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…