2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Citroen Jumpy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
Jumpy
Citroen Jumpy 2.0 HDi (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Citroen Jumpy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
VolvoMakeCitroen
S40ModelJumpy
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats9
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
350 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
4476 mmLength4805 mm
1770 mmWidth1895 mm
1454 mmHeight1942 mm
1498 KgWeight1920 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Citroen Jumpy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Jumpy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…