DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Cowry vs 2012 Citroen Jumpy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeCitroen
CowryModelJumpy
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeMPV
8Seats9
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
143 HPPower163 HP
185 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4805 mm
1704 mmWidth1895 mm
1845 mmHeight1942 mm
1510 KgWeight1920 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Cowry and 2012 Citroen Jumpy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…