DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Citroen C4 vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo S60
CitroenMakeVolvo
C4ModelS60
2013Model year2013
Minivan, MPVBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo S60
13,7 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
92 HPPower115 HP
254 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo S60
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank67 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EGSGears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C4SpecificationVolvo S60
4597 mmLength4628 mm
1826 mmWidth1865 mm
1638-1644 mmHeight1484 mm
1316 KgWeight1488 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Citroen C4 and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…