DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S60 vs 2013 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S60SpecificationCitroen C4
VolvoMakeCitroen
S60ModelC4
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S60SpecificationCitroen C4
10,9 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower92 HP
270 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S60SpecificationCitroen C4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S60SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EGS
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S60SpecificationCitroen C4
4628 mmLength4597 mm
1865 mmWidth1826 mm
1484 mmHeight1638-1644 mm
1488 KgWeight1316 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S60 and 2013 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…