DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S80 vs 2013 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C4
VolvoMakeCitroen
S80ModelC4
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C4
11,5 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
115 HPPower92 HP
270 NmTorque254 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption4,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EGS
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C4
4851 mmLength4597 mm
1861 mmWidth1826 mm
1493 mmHeight1638-1644 mm
1547 KgWeight1316 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S80 and 2013 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…