DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Citroen C3 vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFiat
C3ModelBravo
2012Model year2012
Kombi, MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank57 lt
9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16; 205/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4078 mmLength4336 mm
1766 mmWidth1792 mm
1669-1672 mmHeight1498 mm
1290 KgWeight1320 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Citroen C3 and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…