DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeCitroen
BravoModelC3
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
173 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
290 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption9 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4336 mmLength4078 mm
1792 mmWidth1766 mm
1498 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1320 KgWeight1290 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…