2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 1.6 D2 (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.6 VTi (115 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
S40ModelC3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
11,4 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
270 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption9 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationCitroen C3
4476 mmLength4078 mm
1770 mmWidth1766 mm
1454 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1383 KgWeight1290 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…