2010 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.6 HDi (109 Hp) 2010Overall Score60.25/100
2010 Citroen C3 vs 2010 Toyota Porte Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Toyota
Porte
Toyota Porte 1.5i (109 Hp) 2010Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Citroen C3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen C3SpecificationToyota Porte
CitroenMakeToyota
C3ModelPorte
2010Model year2010
Kombi, MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Citroen C3SpecificationToyota Porte
11,2 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
260 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen C3SpecificationToyota Porte
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen C3SpecificationToyota Porte
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen C3SpecificationToyota Porte
4078 mmLength3990 mm
1766 mmWidth1690 mm
1669-1672 mmHeight1720 mm
1258 KgWeight—
2540 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Citroen C3 and 2010 Toyota Porte approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…