DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Toyota Probox vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCitroen
ProboxModelC3
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
141 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4195 mmLength4078 mm
1695 mmWidth1766 mm
1525 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1030 KgWeight1258 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Toyota Probox and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…