DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
NissanMakeCitroen
ADModelC3
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
148 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
4395 mmLength4078 mm
1695 mmWidth1766 mm
1500 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
—Weight1258 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…