2003 • Citroen
C2
Citroen C2 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Citroen C2 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen C2SpecificationRover 25
CitroenMakeRover
C2Model25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Citroen C2SpecificationRover 25
14,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
166 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
68 HPPower103 HP
150 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen C2SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank50 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen C2SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen C2SpecificationRover 25
3666 mmLength3990 mm
1659 mmWidth1688 mm
1474 mmHeight1417 mm
996 KgWeight1105 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen C2 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…